Presidential Election Prediction Map

What do you think?

My prediction for election day for president.

Election Predictor?

This appears to be very interesting.  I'm going to follow it and see how well it does in November.

Do you have any thoughts?

Amazon Book Sales

Clint Eastwood Speaks, America Listens

Even though I am a registered Republican, I didn't feel there was a real reason to watch the Republican National Convention since Romney's nomination would be a fait accompli.

I finally decided to watch some only because I knew Clint Eastwood would be speaking.  I respect Mr. Eastwood for is acting and directing abilities but I wasn't sure an eighty-two year old actor would do well under the strain of such an event.

    

As I watched his performance I thought it kind of lame and at times thought he was losing his train of thought.  There were however two seminal moments during his oration in which he was spot on.

He declared that President Obama should not be reelected because he wasn't getting the job done and he stated, "See, I never thought it was a good idea for attorneys to be president anyway..."

I wholeheartedly concur with both of these sentiments.  I now admit, it was a constructive activity to listen to Mr. Eastwood's talk.

PATHETIC

President Obama has made a pig's breakfast of the economy of the United States. 

He has shaken the foundation of the system of checks and balances of the federal government by bludgeoning the Supreme Court. In addition he has made many interim appointments that need no congressional approval.

He has weaken the foreign powers of the United States by apologizing to every country imaginable for our actions.  And at the same time he has failed to take decisive leadership actions in the wake of world events.

He as head of the executive branch he is suppose to enforce federal laws but he has allowed the INS not to enforce immigration laws.

With all this said, he believes his path to reelection is to paint his campaign as a fight for women's rights!

Thank you.  Keep going in that direction.  And please leave a nice note to Mr. Romney when you leave the White House in January 2013.

Chief Justice John Roberts

Should Chief Justice John Roberts be impeached?


What say you?

Commissar Obama Speaks: Useful Idiots React

It has been a few days since President Obama threatened the United States Supreme Court.  The most disgusting aspect of his verbal abuse was that it was done in the presence of two other world leaders.  But really, what do you expect from the Commissar-in-Chief ?

To put it in its proper perspective it was not only a threat but a signal for the war to begin.  The war against the court.  And of course it was done exactly on purpose to signal to all the useful-idiots that they must take action and start their salvos against the court.

Enter Maureen Dowd, right on cue!  Her shameful op-ed piece appeared in the New York Times on April 3, with the sexist title of Men in Black. 

She said of the Supreme Court, "It is run by hacks dressed up in black robes."  Do you think this type of characterization is appropriate for describing a co-equal branch of government that provides checks and balances on the executive and legislative branches?

The piece appeared to be an unintelligible rambling of an illiterate fool.   The column was full of venom and ad hominem attacks for the Supreme Court justices, more specifically the conservatives members.   She stated, "...it was stunning to hear Antonin Scalia talking like a Senate Whip..." and later described him as, "...often venomous Scalia."  In her description of Chief Justice John Roberts she said, "...he's a crimson partisan..." and also noted that Justice Alito was, "...the insufferable Samuel Alito..."  And she also commented that, "Inexplicably mute 20 years after he lied his way onto the court, Clarence Thomas..." 

A jewel of her mindless diatribe was stating that in 2000, the court had, "...helped to purloin the election for W...."  whom she goes on to slam for invading Iraq and ignoring Katrina.  If all else fails and you have no cogent argument, attack George Bush.  How typical and how predictable.

The arrogance and condescension that President Obama exhibited for the Supreme Court was surpassed by Ms. Dowd's op-ed piece.

I would have thought that a president, lawyer, college professor or writer would have more respect and reverence for the constitutional responsibilities of the Supreme Court. 

The framers of the Constitution and authors of the Bill of Rights were intelligent and visionary men.  They produced a document that was timeless yet flexible. 

It is a national disgrace that some very high profile people have forgotten this.  How sad, how very sad.


Men in Black op-ed piece

COMMISSAR OBAMA

Well it seems Commissar Obama, the Nanny-in-Chief, has made a number of recess appointments in his continuing effort to ignore the legislative branch of government. It reminds one of President Franklin Roosevelt who tried to pack the Supreme Court in order to rubber stamp his actions as opposed to acquiescing to the judicial branch. It seems Lord Acton was on target about power corrupting those who have it.

In this recent unconstitutional move, President Obama named Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Board and he also made three new members of the pro-union National Labor Relations Board. It is quite obvious that none of these appointments has anything to do with any national emergency or exigent circumstance of any type. These are just the actions of an arrogant socialist trying to control everything in an unprecedented power grab. This is a good tactic since most people are busy watching the economy while the president plays sleight of hand with the legislative powers of Congress to approve these presidential appointments. Hard to approve or deny them when Congress is not in session. The operative dichotomy is to approve or deny!! Yes, Congress, in particular the Senate, has that power. The House has something better, that body has the powers of the "purse string" and the power of impeachment, although the Senate tries the offender.

Therein lies the rub. President Obama refuses to be denied anything in a time when many Americans are denying themselves many things due to the struggling economy. This action seems in sharp contrast to his initial laissez faire attitude when he began his administration. At that time, he let the Democrat controlled Congress produce a pork-u-lus bill which he eagerly signed and thereby committed the American taxpayers to a Herculean debt never before seen in world history! Then to quell the public criticism and political fire storm he caused by doing so, he met with members of Congress to discuss the situation and plainly told John McCain that he lost the presidential race and he won. Therefore, President Obama could do what he wanted and then he told the rest of the duly elected representatives of the taxpayers to (blank) off!

Alas, commissars are like that. We mere mortals who pay taxes to support the many levels of government and the many parasitic members of our society, just don't understand. We are too busy clinging to our religion and guns to truly appreciate the genius of the Dear Leader. O yes, it was quite apparent last year that the very debt commission he appointed, got it wrong too. It was a good thing he was there to propose to decrease the debt by only one quarter of what his commissioners recommended. Bad commissioners, I hope they were banished to a salt mine. (Oh, Uncle Joe Stalin, only now we realize how brilliant you were!)

Is there any good news? Yes, yes, yes! There is a presidential election coming up, that is of course, if President Obama does not cancel it.

I still believe in the American form of republican government. No president yet has destroyed this great country, only because we didn't allow it to happen. Get off your (blank) and vote!